Twitter has just suspended a large number of accounts for political purposes.
Well now, that's interesting. Who decided what accounts were "Alt-Right?" SAN FRANCISCO — Twitter suspended a number of accounts associated with the alt-right movement, the same day the social media service said it would crack down on hate speech.
Among those suspended was Richard Spencer, who runs an alt-right think tank and had a verified account on Twitter.
Heidi Beirich, spokeswoman for the Southern Poverty Law Center, told USA TODAY that the center had asked Twitter to remove more than 100 accounts of white supremacists who violated Twitter's terms of service. She also pointed to two alt-right accounts that had been verified by Twitter, including Spencer's.
The article does -not- say that the SPLC made the decision and Twitter implemented it. However, the article does say the following:
The alt-right used social media to spread its cause of white supremacy, operating largely unchecked by social media giants Twitter and Facebook.
So, the author approves of this decision, and is part of the pol;itical spectrum who no doubt lobbied for it. Probably thinks the SPLC is a noble cause.
Now, I've not been paying attention to Milo Yiannopoulos who was suspended by Twitter back in August, and I don't know who Richard Spencer is or what his "think tank" says.
If they really were George Wallace-KKK-style White Supremacists then I'm sure I'd at least have heard. Richard Spencer is the white Louis Farrakhan? Who knew? So I find it unlikely, given the frantic scramble on the Left to label everyone and everything RAAAAACIST!!!1! that I wouldn't have heard of a -real- racist.
If they really were George Wallace-KKK-style White Supremacists then I'm sure I'd at least have heard. Richard Spencer is the white Louis Farrakhan? Who knew? So I find it unlikely, given the frantic scramble on the Left to label everyone and everything RAAAAACIST!!!1! that I wouldn't have heard of a -real- racist.
Important to note here, and this is my entire point, Noam Chomsky and the e-zine "EcoWatch" both are not on the Twitter suspended list. Noamy can come out and say:
"On Nov. 8, the most powerful country in world history, which will set its stamp on what comes next, had an election. The outcome placed total control of the government—executive, Congress, the Supreme Court—in the hands of the Republican Party, which has become the most dangerous organization in world history.
False news. A lie. A heinous lie, in fact.
But allowed, because it is a lie that works for the Left. Lies that work for the Right (assuming for the sake of argument that everything the SPLC says is true) will not be allowed.
But allowed, because it is a lie that works for the Left. Lies that work for the Right (assuming for the sake of argument that everything the SPLC says is true) will not be allowed.
Some animals are more equal than others. How long before The Phantom Soapbox gets banned?
The Phantom
3 comments:
They want to keep pushing for a civil war, thinking that they, being dedicated revolutionaries will simply roll overall those dangerous rightists and take the power they so richly deserve.
They certainly do seem determined to shut us all up, and having a contrary opinion on mass immigration these days is a good way to have a riot start in front of your house.
gab.ai's mere existance is irritating all the right people.
Post a Comment